Spatial conditionals and illusory inferences
نویسندگان
چکیده
Studies of reasoning often concern specialised domains such as conditional inferences or transitive inferences, but descriptions often cut across such domains, for example: If the circle is to the left of the square then the triangle is to the right of the square. The square is to the right of the circle. The triangle is to the right of the square. Could all three of these assertions be true at the same time? We report four experiments testing the mental model theory of such problems, which combine spatial transitivity and conditional relations. It predicts that reasoners should try to find a single mental model in which all the assertion hold:
منابع مشابه
Deductive reasoning with factual, possible, and counterfactual conditionals.
We compared reasoners' inferences from conditionals based on possibilities in the present or the past (e.g., "If Linda had been in Dublin then Cathy would have been in Galway") with their inferences based on facts in the present or the past (e.g., "If Linda was in Dublin then Cathy was in Galway"). We propose that people construct a richer representation of conditionals that deal with possibili...
متن کاملThe Logic of Conditionals
The standard use of the propositional calculus ('P.C.') in analyzing the validity of inferences involving conditionals leads to fallacies, and the problem is to determine where P.C. may be 'safely' used. An alternative analysis of criteria of reasonableness of inferences in terms of conditions of justification rather than truth of statements is proposed. It is argued, under certain restrictions...
متن کاملHow falsity dispels fallacies
From certain sorts of premise, individuals reliably infer invalid conclusions. Two experiments investigated a possible cause for these illusory inference: Reasoners fail to think about what is false. In Experiment 1, 24 undergraduates drew illusory and control inferences from premises based on exclusive disjunctions (‘‘or else’’). In one block, participants were instructed to falsify the premis...
متن کاملDisjunctive illusory inferences and how to eliminate them.
The mental model theory of reasoning postulates that individuals construct mental models of the possibilities in which the premises of an inference hold and that these models represent what is true but not what is false. An unexpected consequence of this assumption is that certain premises should yield systematically invalid inferences. This prediction is unique among current theories of reason...
متن کاملIllusory Inferences about Embedded Disjunctions
The mental model theory of reasoning postulates that individuals construct mental models of the possibilities consistent with premises, and that these models represent what is true but not what is false. An unexpected consequence of this assumption is that certain premises should yield systematically invalid inferences. This prediction is unique amongst current theories of reasoning, because no...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016